Recycling polymers to make greenhouses
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<b><sc>Abstract.</sc></b> Canadian food self-sufficiency is a major issue and current domestic greenhouse production can produce a part of consumption. However, a large amount of Canada's food supply is imported, and road transport is currently a major Canadian political issue, which also generates greenhouse gases (GHG). To develop the locality and circularity of products from greenhouse production, the project aims to develop new greenhouse designs by recycling agricultural polymers that are accumulating on Canadian farms and that can be used for another cycle. Formulating new polymers based on recycled polyethylene (PE), polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), and other types should answer this challenge. In this work, a protocol was established to ensure the quality control of the recycled PE materials. One type of structural composite is designed based on the recycled agricultural polymers. The new greenhouse design also aims to reduce the greenhouse's energy consumption. The use of renewable energy combined with these new materials can also limit the use of fossil energy. The new greenhouse design should increase crop yields, reducing production costs. It will contribute to building a more diversified and sustainable food system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".