MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4412123997 · doi:10.13031/aim.202500158

Evaluation of the Effect of Climate Change in Nova Scotia with Approach of Forecasting Evapotranspiration

2025· article· en· W4412123997 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mona Golabi, Travis J. Esau

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPlant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNova scotiaNova (rocket)EvapotranspirationClimate changeEnvironmental scienceMeteorologyComputer scienceClimatologyGeographyGeologyEngineeringOceanographyAeronauticsArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. Climate change significantly threatens agriculture globally, potentially impacting crop yields, water availability, and food security. Climate change has caused increasing temperatures and decreasing precipitation because of Greenhouse Gas emissions. Rising temperatures can lead to increasing evapotranspiration, heat stress in crops, reducing yields, and altering plant development. Warmer conditions may also favor the spread of pests and diseases. Shifts in rainfall patterns, including more frequent droughts and floods, can disrupt planting and harvesting schedules, damage crops, and erode soil. To cope with the changing climate, farmers must adopt new farming practices, such as drought-resistant crops, improved irrigation systems, and climate-smart agriculture techniques. To combat and adapt to climate change, it is necessary to be aware of the quantitative and qualitative changes in meteorological parameters. This study investigates the impacts of climate change in Nova Scotia, Canada, using historical climate data (2000–2020) from the Kentville weather station and future projections (2021–2040) simulated with the LARS-WG V8 software and the CanESM5 model. The Dumarten climate coefficient identified the study area as a very humid region, with a coefficient value of 56.2 during the base period. The model evaluation showed high accuracy in predicting maximum and minimum temperatures (R² = 0.95 and 0.93, respectively) and moderate accuracy for total precipitation (R² = 0.85). Future climate projections revealed significant changes, including a warming trend with fewer extreme cold events, higher average temperatures, and more frequent heat extremes. Total precipitation showed reduced maximum values, suggesting less intense rainfall events, while mean and minimum precipitation levels remained stable. Evapotranspiration (ETp) projections indicated an upward trend with increased variability, pointing to heightened risks of water stress and agricultural challenges. These findings highlight the potential impacts of climate change on water resources, agriculture, and ecosystems, emphasizing the need for adaptive strategies to mitigate climate risks in Nova Scotia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.103
Threshold uncertainty score0.207

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPlant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics→French-language works237,207→