MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412141940 · doi:10.1093/pasj/psaf070

Unraveling the structure of the stratified ultra-fast outflows in PDS 456 with XRISM

2025· article· en· W4412141940 on OpenAlexafffund
Yerong Xu, Luigi Gallo, Kouichi Hagino, J. N. Reeves, Francesco Tombesi, Misaki Mizumoto, A. Luminari, A G Gonzalez, Ehud Behar, Rozenn Boissay-Malaquin, V. Braito, Pierpaolo Condó, Chris Done, Aiko Miyamoto, Ryuki Mizukawa, Hirokazu Odaka, A. Tanimoto, Makoto S Tashiro, Tahir Yaqoob, Satoshi Yamada

Bibliographic record

VenuePublications of the Astronomical Society of Japan · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsSaint Mary's University
FundersCanadian Space AgencyScience and Technology Facilities CouncilYamada Science FoundationEuropean CommissionKagoshima UniversityJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsPhysicsStratified flowsAstrophysicsAstronomyStratified flowMechanicsTurbulence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Multiple clumpy wind components ($v_\mathrm{out}\sim 0.2\!-\!0.3c$) in the luminous quasar PDS 456 have recently been resolved in the Fe K band for the first time, thanks to the high-resolution X-ray spectrometer Resolve onboard XRISM. In this paper, we investigate the structure of ultra-fast outflows (UFOs) using coordinated observations from XRISM, XMM–Newton, and NuSTAR, along with the self-consistently calculated photoionization model PION. Our results reveal a stratified ionization structure, characterized by a scaling relation between wind velocity and ionization parameter $v_\mathrm{out}\propto \xi ^{(0.14\pm 0.04)}$. To evaluate the screening effect in photoionization modeling, we tested all possible order permutations of six PION components. We find that highly ionized UFOs ($\log \xi >4.5$) are insensitive to their relative positions, whereas the soft X-ray UFO ($\log \xi \sim 3$ and $v_\mathrm{out}\sim 0.27c$) and the lowest-ionized hard X-ray UFO ($\log \xi \sim 4.1$ and $v_\mathrm{out}\sim 0.23c$) are statistically favored—based on the evidence from both the C-statistic and Bayesian analysis—to occupy the middle and innermost layers, respectively. This suggests a possible trend where slower UFOs are launched from regions closer to the supermassive black hole. The soft X-ray UFO is found to be thermally unstable, regardless of its relative position. However, its location remains unclear. Our sequence analysis and its similarity to hard X-ray UFOs suggest that they may be co-spatial, while variability constraints support its location within the broad-line region at sub-parsec scales. Simulations with XRISM with an open gate valve show that high-resolution soft X-ray data can enhance the reliability of our results. Furthermore, simulations with the future X-ray mission NewAthena demonstrate its capability to resolve the absorber sequence and spatial distributions, enabling the determination of UFO structures and their roles in active galactic nucleus feedback.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePublications of the Astronomical Society of JapanSame topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207