Recurrent Cometary Activity Discovered on Quasi-Hilda Jupiter Family Comet 362P/(457175) 2008 GO<sub>98</sub>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We report the discovery of recurrent activity on quasi-Hilda comet (QHC) 362P/(457175) 2008 GO98. The first activity epoch was discovered during the perihelion passage of 362P in 2016, so we were motivated to observe it for recurrent cometary activity near its next perihelion passage (UT 2024 July 20). We obtained observations with the Lowell Discovery Telescope, the Astrophysical Research Consortium telescope, and the Vatican Advanced Technology Telescope and identified a second activity epoch when 362P had a true anomaly (ν) as early as 318 . ° 1. We conducted archival searches of six repositories and identified images obtained with Canada–France–Hawaii Telescope MegaCam, Dark Energy Camera, Pan-STARRS 1, SkyMapper, Zwicky Transient Facility, and Las Cumbres Observatory Global Telescope network data. Using these data, we identified activity from a previously unreported time span, and we did not detect activity when 362P was away from perihelion, specifically 83∘ < ν < 318∘. Detection of activity near perihelion and absence of activity away from perihelion suggest thermally driven activity and volatile sublimation. Our dynamical simulations suggest 362P is a QHC, and it will remain in a combined Jupiter-family comet (JFC) and quasi-Hilda orbit over the next 1 kyr though it will become increasingly chaotic nearing the end of this timeframe. Our reverse simulations suggest 362P may have migrated from the orbit of a long-period comet (∼53%) or Centaur (∼32%); otherwise it remained a JFC (∼15%) over the previous 100 kyr. We recommend additional telescope observations from the community as 362P continues outbound from its perihelion on UT 2024 July 20, as well as continued observations for a third activity epoch.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".