Microscopic Investigation of the Effect of Different Wormhole Configurations on CO2-Based Cyclic Solvent Injection in Post-CHOPS Reservoirs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cyclic Solvent Injection (CSI), one of the most promising solvent-based enhanced oil recovery (EOR) methods, has attracted the oil industry’s interest due to its energy efficiency, produced oil quality, and environmental suitability. Previous studies revealed that foamy oil flow is considered as one of the main mechanisms of the CSI process. However, due to the presence of complex high-permeable channels known as wormholes in Post-Cold Heavy Oil Production with Sands (Post-CHOPS) reservoirs, understanding the effect of each operational parameter on the performance of the CSI process in these reservoirs requires a pore-scale investigation of different wormhole configurations. Therefore, in this project, a comprehensive microfluidic experimental investigation into the effect of symmetrical and asymmetrical wormholes during the CSI process has been conducted. A total of 11 tests were designed, considering four different microfluidic systems with various wormhole configurations. Various operational parameters, including solvent type, pressure depletion rate, and the number of cycles, were considered to assess their effects on foamy oil behavior in post-CHOPS reservoirs in the presence of wormholes. The finding revealed that the wormhole configuration plays a crucial role in controlling the oil production behavior. While the presence of the wormhole in a symmetrical design could positively improve oil production, it would restrict oil production in an asymmetrical design. To address this challenge, we used the solvent mixture containing 30% propane that outperformed CO2, overcame the impact of the asymmetrical wormhole, and increased the total recovery factor by 14% under a 12 kPa/min pressure depletion rate compared to utilizing pure CO2. Moreover, the results showed that applying a lower pressure depletion rate at 4 kPa/min could recover a slightly higher amount of oil, approximately 2%, during the first cycle compared to tests conducted under higher pressure depletion rates. However, in later cycles, a higher pressure depletion rate at 12 kPa/min significantly improved foamy oil flow quality and, subsequently, heavy oil recovery. The interesting finding, as observed, is the gap difference between the total recovery factor at the end of the cycle and the recovery factor after the first cycle, which increases noticeably with higher pressure depletion rate, increasing from 9.5% under 4 kPa/min to 16% under 12 kPa/min.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".