MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4412150981 · doi:10.1186/s12889-025-23617-z

Maternal metabolic health conditions and risk of stillbirth in India: evidence from a nationwide survey

2025· article· en· W4412150981 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammad Hammad, Shivalingappa S. Halli, Mohammad Hifz Ur Rahman

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Public Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGestational Diabetes Research and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBiostatisticsPublic healthEnvironmental healthEpidemiologyObstetricsNursingInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Stillbirth, defined by foetal death at or beyond 28 weeks of gestation, represents a significant challenge in India, contributing to approximately 500,000 foetal deaths each year. The country's stillbirth rate of 12.2 per 1000 births underscores the imperative to address this preventable occurrence. While maternal metabolic conditions diabetes, and hypertension, are widely recognized as established risk factors for stillbirth worldwide, the extent of their impact on India's stillbirth burden remains inadequately elucidated due to limited evidence. METHODS: This cross-sectional study utilized NFHS-5 data to examine stillbirths in the most recent pregnancy outcomes of 204,723 women aged 15-49 years, sampled from all states and union territories of India. The primary exposures assessed were diabetes, and hypertension. Descriptive analyses were conducted to determine the prevalence of diabetes, hypertension and stillbirths. Logistic regression was used to quantify the association between diabetes, hypertension and the risk of stillbirth, indicated by adjusted odds ratios (AOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The study also assessed effect modification by maternal age, education, wealth quintile, and social category. RESULTS: The prevalence of diabetes and hypertension was 1% and 3% respectively, while the stillbirth rate was 1%. diabetes conferred a significantly higher risk of stillbirth with an increase of 74% (AOR 1.74, CI 1.14-2.67) as compared to women without diabetes. The risk was potential among mothers with hypertension with an increase of 50% (AOR 1.50, CI 1.16-1.95) on contrary to women without hypertension. The combined model (i.e. having diabetes or hypertension) also showed a significant risk of stillbirth with a higher risk of 58% (AOR 1.58, CI 1.25-1.99) indicating a synergistic interaction. Stratified analyses revealed the stillbirth risk among mothers belonging to the scheduled caste category (AOR 1.30, CI 1.10-1.53). CONCLUSION: Diabetes, and hypertension, increase stillbirth risk in India, highlighting the need for better metabolic health management pre- and during pregnancy. Our research highlights the need of integrated care for diabetes and hypertension is crucial. Targeted interventions for high-risk mothers and improved screening are vital to reduce stillbirth rates. More research is needed to understand these risks better. Collaboration across medical fields is essential to save lives and improve pregnancy outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.080

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC Public Health→Same topicGestational Diabetes Research and Management→French-language works237,207→