MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412151204 · doi:10.1186/s12963-025-00401-0

Socioeconomic inequalities and its spatial pattern in sanitary napkin use in Bangladesh: evidence from the 2019 multiple indicator cluster survey

2025· article· en· W4412151204 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePopulation Health Metrics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMenstrual Health and Disorders
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersUNICEF
KeywordsSocioeconomic statusMedicineCluster (spacecraft)Public healthHealth services researchEnvironmental healthInequalityEpidemiologySpatial epidemiologyBiostatisticsSocioeconomicsDemographyPopulationPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Utilization of unhygienic menstrual products has been associated with various adverse health consequences, particularly in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), including Bangladesh. In this context, this study attempted to measure socioeconomic inequalities in sanitary napkin use among women aged 15-49 and assess its spatial pattern at the disaggregated level (district). METHODS: We used the latest available nationally representative cross-sectional Bangladesh Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey (MICS) 2019 data. The analytical sample size was 54,702 reproductive-aged (15-49 years) women. The Erreygers Index (EI) and the Wagstaff Index (WI) were employed to measure and decompose the socioeconomic inequalities in sanitary napkin use. Natural Break (Jenks) classification method, Global Moran's I and the Cluster and Outlier Analysis were used to analyze the spatial pattern of socioeconomic inequalities at the district level. RESULTS: The findings reveal that approximately 26.22% of women used sanitary napkins at the national level. Both the EI (0.41208; p-value < 0.001) and the WI (0.53251; p-value < 0.001) indicate a pro-rich inequality in sanitary napkin use. Decomposition results indicated that wealth status, educational attainment, household characteristics (particularly educational attainment of household head) and exposure to media were the most important factors accounting for socioeconomic inequalities. From the spatial analyses, we found significant district-level variations in both sanitary napkin use and its socioeconomic inequalities. Global Moran's I value indicated positive spatial autocorrelation, meaning that similar values tend to cluster together. Notably, a northwestern and southeastern divide was found between High-High and Low-Low clusters of socioeconomic inequalities. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides evidence for informed policymaking targeting women from the lower socioeconomic stratum, especially those living in the northwestern and southeastern regions to increase sanitary napkin use.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.209
Threshold uncertainty score0.843

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.120
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it