MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412152593 · doi:10.1080/13697137.2025.2524170

Comparison of bone mineral density and influencing factors in iatrogenic and idiopathic POI

2025· article· en· W4412152593 on OpenAlexaff
Zecheng Wang, Xiangyan Ruan, Lingling Jiang, Mingzhen Zhang, Yang Yu, Anming Liu, Jing Li, Muqing Gu, Yanqiu Li, Jiaojiao Cheng, Fengyu Jin, Juan Du, Alfred O. Mueck

Bibliographic record

VenueClimacteric · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOvarian function and disorders
Canadian institutionsB.C. Women's Hospital & Health Centre
FundersBeijing Municipal Administration of HospitalsBeijing Municipal Health Commission
KeywordsMedicineBone mineralDentistryInternal medicineOsteoporosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective This study aimed to investigate the characteristics of bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with premature ovarian insufficiency (POI), compare BMD between iatrogenic POI and idiopathic POI patients, and investigate the factors affecting BMD in POI patients.Method This cross-sectional study recruited a total of 88 iatrogenic POI patients, 45 idiopathic POI patients and 45 normal reproductive-age women, all of whom met the study criteria and were treated at the Department of Gynecological Endocrinology, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University from 1 January 2023 to 30 June 2024. Medical history was collected for all patients, and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), estradiol (E2), total testosterone (TT), free testosterone (FT), biologically active testosterone (BioT), dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS) were measured. Height and weight were measured, and the body mass index (BMI) was calculated. BMD of the lumbar spine and left femur was measured in POI patients. Multiple linear regression analyses were performed to determine the correlation between characteristics and BMD.Results The incidence of osteoporosis was significantly higher in iatrogenic POI patients than in idiopathic POI patients (40.9% vs. 20.0%, p < 0.05). The femoral shaft BMD, greater trochanter BMD t-score, total femoral BMD and total femoral BMD t-score were significantly lower in iatrogenic POI patients compared to idiopathic POI patients (all p < 0.05). Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that delay in diagnosis negatively affected the lumbar BMD t-score (p < 0.05) and the BMI and DHEAS positively affected the total femur BMD t-score in iatrogenic POI patients (p < 0.05). No significant correlations were found in idiopathic POI patients.Conclusion The incidence of osteopenia and osteoporosis in POI patients is high, especially in iatrogenic POI patients, who experience more severe bone loss and a higher incidence of osteoporosis. BMI and a delay in diagnosis significantly affected BMD in iatrogenic POI patients. This, to our knowledge, is the first study showing that DHEAS positively affects BMD in iatrogenic POI patients, which, however, needs further studies for confirmation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClimactericSame topicOvarian function and disordersFrench-language works237,207