MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412157011 · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-03633-0

Spatial separation between two sounds affects first-spike latencies of responses elicited by the sounds in the rat’s auditory midbrain neurons

2025· article· en· W4412157011 on OpenAlexafffund
Mathiang G. Chot, Huiming Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMidbrainNeuroscienceSound (geography)Spike (software development)Auditory pathwaysBiologyAudiologySpeech recognitionComputer scienceAcousticsMedicineCentral nervous system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The first-spike latency (FSL) is an important temporal characteristic of a neurophysiological response. We study the FSLs of sound-driven responses in individual neurons in the rat’s auditory midbrain. Responses were elicited by a train of stimuli created using multiple presentations of two tone bursts with different frequencies. Presentations of the two sounds were interleaved temporally in a random order. We found that the mean and the temporal variation of FSL of the response elicited by a sound was increased when the sound was presented more frequently or when it was moved from the ear that drove an excitatory response to the ear that drove an inhibitory effect. Furthermore, the FSL of response to one sound was dependent on the spatial location of the other sound. Results suggested that the timing of the first spike could be used by midbrain neurons to encode information related to the probability of occurrence and spatial location of a sound. It could also be used to gauge how the sound was related to the other sound in spatial location. These results enhance our understanding of neural bases of binaural hearing, especially in an environment with temporally separated competing sounds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific ReportsSame topicHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsFrench-language works237,207