MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412158809 · doi:10.1177/01976931251355252

Fossil Crinoids in the archaeology of the United States and Canada

2025· article· en· W4412158809 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bill Sandy

Bibliographic record

VenueNorth American Archaeologist · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArchaeology and Natural History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArchaeologyTaphonomyGeographyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Excavations at two Precontact Native American sites in the Wallkill River Valley in Orange County, New York provided considerable new information about the production and use of fossil crinoid beads. The Historian Site in the Town of Minisink and Medline Site 3 in the Town of Montgomery collectively have radiocarbon dates spanning 2300 to 1500 years ago. Crinoids are marine dwelling animals that are found in limestone bearing strata throughout much of North America. Native Americans use of crinoid columnal segments for beads was widespread throughout the United States and Canada in the Precontact and Historic Periods. Archaeological sites with crinoid beads are detailed in this report. The larger significance and possible interpretations of these discoveries are discussed. Because of their small size and fossil origin, excavators and analysts could overlook crinoids. Reexamination of existing archaeological collections will likely “discover” more. Increased use of flotation can recover more crinoids.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.168

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.008
Science and technology studies0.0070.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNorth American ArchaeologistSame topicArchaeology and Natural HistoryFrench-language works237,207