A randomized controlled trial of emotionally focused individual therapy (EFIT) for depression and anxiety.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
= 12.28). Sixty-three percent identified as women, and 37% identified as male. In terms of ethnicity, 73% identified as White, 1.3% as Black, 7.7% as Southeast Asian, 7.7% as East Asian, 3.8% as Latinx, and 2.6% as First Nation. Participants completed the Outcome Questionnaire-30.2, the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Depression scale, and the PROMIS-Anxiety scale. Multilevel modeling results confirmed a significant difference in growth curves between the treatment group and controls on all measures. Follow-up analyses demonstrated significant reductions in symptom distress (Outcome Questionnaire-30.2) and symptoms of depression and anxiety (PROMIS-Depression and PROMIS-Anxiety) across 15 weeks. Overall, the results of this study suggest that EFIT leads to significant symptom reduction among people with depression and anxiety. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it