MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract B041: A Cellular Network-Aware Foundation Model Improves Single-Cell Level Predictions

2025· article· en· W4412163730 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mingxuan Zhang, Vinay Swamy, Léo Dupire, Rowan Cassius, Charilaos Kanatsoulis, Evan Paull, Theofanis Karaletsos, Andrea Califano

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cancer Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Body Area Networks
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFoundation (evidence)Computer scienceMedicineComputational biologyBiologyHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Large-scale, single-cell transcriptomics datasets present an opportunity to develop foundation models for universal cell and gene representations. Yet, single-cell foundation models are often trained or evaluated based on abstract rather than biologically relevant benchmarks, such as predicting the specific perturbations that may induce a desired state transition in a tumor or TME cells, which are especially critical in oncology. Critically, current foundation models fail to effectively leverage the increasingly understanding of regulatory and signaling networks (gene regulator networks or GRN for short), which would serve as a biological inductive bias and significantly constrain the potential solution search space. These networks can also enhance language model performance by introducing meaningful relative positional information and long-range dependencies between gene tokens. While current transformer-based models should be able, in theory, to learn GRN structure during training, the very large number of pairwise and three-ways interactions—combined with the non-local and loopy structure of GRNs—makes this task exceedingly challenging for models. We propose that leveraging graph models, representing the molecular interactions governing cell behavior, can significantly improve single cell foundation model performance. For this purpose, we introduce a foundation model that leverages large-scale graph topologies and graph diffusion approaches to support Transformers’ attention mechanisms, thus effectively learning generalizable single cell level gene embeddings that are consistent with the cell’s underlying regulatory logic. By enforcing subpopulation-specific, GRN-consistent solutions—which support modeling and quantifying the heterogeneity of both tumor and TME-related cells in-silico—such an approach also addresses critical issues arising from lack of context specificity. This supports biologically relevant tasks, such as predicting gene expression distributions and treatment effects induced by unseen genetic perturbations. To validate the computational integrity of our model, we performed comprehensive benchmarking studies on tasks such as cell type prediction/annotation, GRN structure understanding, and gene expression predictions. The cellular network-aware model outperformed state-of-the-art foundation model baselines. By capturing regulatory dependencies between gene products, the model reduces the solution search space and facilitates biologically grounded predictions. We propose that such GRN-enabled models are better suited to address biologically relevant questions—such as elucidating mechanistic determinants ranging from oncogenesis and progression to immune evasion and exhaustion. Citation Format: Mingxuan Zhang, Vinay Swamy, Léo Dupire, Rowan Cassius, Charilaos Kanatsoulis, Evan Paull, Theofanis Karaletsos, Andrea Califano. A Cellular Network-Aware Foundation Model Improves Single-Cell Level Predictions [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning; 2025 Jul 10-12; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2025;31(13_Suppl):Abstract nr B041.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.449
Threshold uncertainty score0.870

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.203
GPT teacher head0.422
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Cancer ResearchSame topicWireless Body Area NetworksFrench-language works237,207