MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract A031: Unsupervised graph-based visualization of variational autoencoder latent spaces reveals hidden multiple myeloma subtypes

2025· article· en· W4412163734 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Anish K. Simhal, Rena Elkin, Ross Firestone, Jung Hun Oh, Joseph O. Deasy

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cancer Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAI in cancer detection
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutoencoderVisualizationMultiple myelomaArtificial intelligenceGraphPattern recognition (psychology)Computer scienceComputational biologyMedicineBiologyTheoretical computer scienceArtificial neural networkInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Latent space representations learned through variational autoencoders (VAEs) offer a powerful, unsupervised means of capturing nonlinear structure in high-dimensional oncology data. The latent embedding spaces often encode information that differs from traditional bioinformatics methods such as t-SNE or UMAP. However, a persistent challenge remains: how to meaningfully visualize and interpret these latent variables. Common dimensionality reduction techniques like UMAP and t-SNE, while effective, can obscure graph-theoretic relationships that may underlie important biological patterns. We present a novel approach for intuitive latent space interpretation using NetFlow, a method that visualizes the organizational structure of samples as a graph derived from their latent embeddings. NetFlow constructs a topological representation based on the metric structure of the latent space, drawing on concepts from network analysis, optimal mass transport, topological data analysis, and lineage tracing. The result is an interpretable graph in which nodes represent individual subjects and edges reflect local and global similarity among the samples. We applied this method to multiple myeloma (MM), a hematologic malignancy marked by malignant plasma cell proliferation and inevitable relapse. To uncover hidden disease subtypes, we trained a VAE on multimodal data from 659 patients in the MMRF CoMMpass dataset (IA19), integrating transcriptomic, genomic, and clinical features. Direct clustering of latent space vectors failed to yield subgroups with significant differences in progression-free survival (PFS). In contrast, NetFlow generated a latent space graph that, when clustered using Louvain community detection, identified three distinct subtypes: one high-risk and two low-risk groups. The high-risk group exhibited a median PFS of 1.5 years shorter than the low-risk groups (p<0.001) and was enriched for known poor prognostic markers including gain 1q21 (59%), MAF translocations (17%), and t(4;14) (66%). Although the two low-risk groups had similar PFS outcomes, they differed in their molecular profiles, suggesting they may benefit from different therapeutic strategies. These preliminary results demonstrate that variational autoencoders and NetFlow graph analysis can reveal latent substructures missed by traditional clustering, thereby advancing latent space explainability and enabling improved subtype discovery in MM. Our framework offers a generalizable pipeline for interpreting deep generative models in cancer genomics. Citation Format: Anish K. Simhal, Rena Elkin, Ross S. Firestone, Jung Hun Oh, Joseph O. Deasy. Unsupervised graph-based visualization of variational autoencoder latent spaces reveals hidden multiple myeloma subtypes [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning; 2025 Jul 10-12; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2025;31(13_Suppl):Abstract nr A031.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.147
GPT teacher head0.470
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Cancer Research→Same topicAI in cancer detection→French-language works237,207→