Abstract A027: Multiscale systems approach to target tumor ecosystem responses for therapeutic benefit
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Triple-negative breast cancer is a highly aggressive disease subtype with limited treatment options. Despite the approval of targeted therapies such as PARP inhibitors, metastatic progression remains inevitable. Additionally, spatial arrangements, including immune exclusion zones and immune–stromal crosstalk, can profoundly influence therapeutic response. These observations underscore the need for more effective, individualized treatments that both target malignant cells and promote anti-tumor microenvironments. Toward that goal, we have developed a coordinated experimental-computational approach designed to enable identification of effective treatment strategies that consider the functional relationships between different cell types. First, to identify adaptive responses that may serve as therapeutic vulnerabilities, we treated C3TAg genetically engineered mouse model with a panel of clinically approved therapies then subjected these samples to single-cell RNAseq and multiplex tissue imaging. We observed that relatively short treatment durations lead to changes in the composition and spatial organization of tumors, suggesting adaptive responses that may be leveraged in combination treatment strategies. Notably, we observed changes in several macrophage populations, including changes to co-localization of M2-like macrophage and cancer-associated fibroblasts, highlighting stromal responses to therapeutic pressure. Second, we are using the resultant data to guide development and parameterization of an agent-based model that considers the functional relationships between different tumor components and can be used to predict effective therapeutic treatment strategies. We have developed analytical approaches to leverage our single-cell RNAseq data to estimate key model parameters operable in prioritized cell populations, including those related to proliferation, motility, antigen presentation, and cell-cell signaling. Initial model simulations suggest that spatial cell patterns are often not steady: immune cells dynamically aggregate, disperse, migrate, and reaggregate at new locations; macrophages infiltrated hypoxic and necrotic regions, where they polarized from an anti-tumor M1-like state to a pro-tumor M2-like state. These observations lay the groundwork for leveraging agent-based models for in silico testing of therapeutic combinations that can be prioritized for experimental validation. In total, our approach has the potential to rationally identify effective therapeutic strategies that lead to long-term durable control of tumors. Citation Format: Laura M. Heiser, Young Hwan Chang, Paul Macklin. Multiscale systems approach to target tumor ecosystem responses for therapeutic benefit [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning; 2025 Jul 10-12; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2025;31(13_Suppl):Abstract nr A027.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".