MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract B023: Deep learning-based prediction of immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy in brain metastases using brain MRI

2025· article· en· W4412163764 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Melisa S. Guelen, Tobias R. Bodenmann, Mason C. Cleveland, Jay Patel, Felix J. Dorfner, Nelson Gil, Shreyas Bhat Brahmavar, Dagoberto Pulido-Arias, Jayashree Kalpathy–Cramer, Bruce R. Rosen, Elizabeth R. Gerstner, Jawed Nawabi, David Wasilewski, Andrea Dell’Orco, Albert E. Kim, Christopher P. Bridge

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cancer Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBrain metastasisImmune systemImmune checkpointOncologyImmunotherapyCancerInternal medicineMetastasisImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Brain metastases (BM) are an emerging challenge in modern oncology due to increasing incidence and limited treatments. Recent work by our group and others has illustrated that immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are a promising therapy for treatment-refractory BM of diverse histologies. Yet, likelihood of response to ICI varies highly between patients, and the therapy often causes severe adverse effects. To build upon our findings and integrate ICI into precision medicine strategies for BM, scalable tools that quantify likelihood of response are needed. Methods: We curated a multi-institutional dataset of longitudinal mpMRI for 860 BM patients treated with ICI, assessing 2,542 BM responses based on pre- and 6-month post-treatment MRIs using standardized RANO criteria. A convolutional neural network (CNN) trained on pre-treatment mpMRI sequences predicted 6-month ICI efficacy. To ensure class balance and clinical relevance, four RANO classes were converted into a binary model: intracranial benefit including complete response (CR), partial response (PR) and stable disease (SD) vs. progressive disease (PD). Our custom CNN consists of three convolutional and two fully connected layers, with an 80/20 train-validation split. We also developed a "foundation model" for brain metastases using self-supervised contrastive learning with the SimCLR framework on studies from 9,408 patients from multiple private and public datasets. Our model has a 3D ResNet50 architecture and was pretrained on the axial T1-weighted, contrast-enhanced sequences of 11,659 BM mpMRIs. Image preprocessing was standardized for all our models and included reorientation, isotropic resampling to a 1 mm resolution, registration, N4 bias field correction, skull stripping, and normalization of image intensities to a zero mean and unit variance. The contrastive loss was computed by contrasting voxels centered around the centroid of the segmented tumor region against randomly selected non-tumor regions of the MRI studies. The model was then fine-tuned for ICI efficacy prediction using the same dataset that trained the CNN, held out during pretraining. A logistic regression model was trained on features extracted from the foundation model. Results: Our CNN achieved an area under receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) score of 0.650 on the validation set. We are actively optimizing the models, developing multi-class response models (e.g., CR/PR vs. SD vs. PD) and conducting subgroup analyses, such as histology-specific performance. Notably, fine-tuning the foundation model with a linear classifier resulted in an improved AUROC score of 0.7601. This demonstrates the potential of our pretraining approach for enhanced predictive performance. Conclusion: Our study presents one of the first Deep Learning-based efforts to predict ICI efficacy for BM. There is emerging promise in using Deep Learning to identify under-appreciated or previously unknown imaging patterns of biological significance within clinically acquired imaging. Citation Format: Melisa S. Guelen, Tobias R. Bodenmann, Mason C. Cleveland, Jay B. Patel, Felix J. Dorfner, Nelson Gil, Shreyas B. Brahmavar, Dagoberto Pulido-Arias, Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer, Jean-Philippe Tiran, Bruce R. Rosen, Elizabeth Gerstner, Jawed Nawabi, David Wasilewski, Andrea Dell'Orco, Albert E. Kim, Christopher P. Bridge. Deep learning-based prediction of immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy in brain metastases using brain MRI [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning; 2025 Jul 10-12; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2025;31(13_Suppl):Abstract nr B023.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.191
GPT teacher head0.543
Teacher spread0.351 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Cancer Research→Same topicMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications→French-language works237,207→