MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract B053: Empowering AI-driven prediction of the tumor microenvironment from histopathology images via molecular annotation

2025· article· en· W4412163773 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Siao-Han Wong, Benedikt Brors, Sonja Loges

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cancer Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistopathologyAnnotationMedicinePathologyComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The tumor microenvironment (TME) actively contribute to tumor development and treatment response. The interplay between tumor cells, immune cells, fibroblasts and blood vessels contribute to immune escape and drug resistance. Prior to treatment, higher tumor infiltrating lymphocytes correlate with better survival, while greater stromal content is linked to poor survival. Studying the composition and dynamics of the TME is essential for improving patient stratification, however a scalable tool for addressing this question is still lacking. Spatially resolved omics technologies allow for charting tissue architecture at the individual cell level, though large-scale studies remain challenging due to high expenses. In contrast, hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) slides are a cost-effective modality that provide rich morphological information for studying spatial biology. However, their use relies on pathologist interpretation. A key area of research in digital pathology has been automating cell (type) identification, predicting nuclei location and cell type in H&E slides. Existing deep learning models are limited by the quantity and diversity of training data, which requires pathologists to carefully annotate the location and identity of large volume of cells. To date, the largest dataset comprises approximately 200,000 cells, annotated with four cell types across 19 cancer types. We propose a novel approach of automated “molecular annotation”, where cell types and location on H&E slides are annotated with the aid of spatial proteomics, in place of pathologist annotation. Specifically, samples were profiled with both modalities. From the spatial omics modality, pixels were first segmented into cells, followed by cell clustering and cluster annotation based on molecular features of the cells. The location and identity of all cells on the tissue were then identified. These information were subsequently transferred to the H&E image by alignment at single-cell resolution, forming a dataset annotated with molecular ground truth. With a spatial omics dataset of two spatial proteomics slides from colorectal cancer patients, we obtained 160,000 annotated cells including 50,000 immune cells, 25,000 tumor cells, 12,600 stroma, 7,900 endothelial cells, among others. The size of this dataset is close to the largest annotated dataset publicly available to date. We then use this dataset to benchmark existing state-of-the-art deep-learning based cell type predictions models, as well as to fine-tune existing models for predicting cells in the colorectal tumor microenvironment. This proof-of-concept study aims to demonstrate the feasibility of molecular annotation approach. By including more spatial omics data, this approach can boost the performance of existing pre-trained models and enhance generalizability to specific tumor types. It opens up the opportunity to harness millions of cells for deep learning models to predict cell types on H&E slides, make AI models a cost-effective option for studying the TME. Citation Format: Siao-Han Wong, Benedikt Brors, Sonja Loges. Empowering AI-driven prediction of the tumor microenvironment from histopathology images via molecular annotation [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning; 2025 Jul 10-12; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2025;31(13_Suppl):Abstract nr B053.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.463
Teacher spread0.420 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Cancer Research→Same topicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging→French-language works237,207→