MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract B051: Elastic net discovery of DNA methylation biomarkers for non-invasive diagnosis and recurrence detection in head and neck cancer

2025· article· en· W4412163786 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alexander C. Sprague, Damaris Kuhnell, Wei‐Wen Hsu, Trisha M. Wise‐Draper, Scott M. Langevin

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cancer Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGene expression and cancer classification
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHead and neck cancerMedicineCancerDNA methylationHead and neckOncologyPathologyComputational biologyInternal medicineSurgeryBiologyGeneGeneticsGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is diagnosed in nearly 60,000 Americans each year. Despite therapeutic advances in recent decades, survival rates have remained largely unchanged. A major contributing factor to poor outcomes is the lack of a non-invasive screening test for HNSCC, as well as the high recurrence rates within two years of curative therapy. In this study, we aimed to leverage elastic net penalized regression to identify and validate DNA methylation biomarkers for HNSCC using non-invasive oral rinse samples. Methods: Oral rinse methylation data from the Collaborative Study of Head and Neck Diseases (CoHANDS), a large population-based case-control study of HNSCC in the greater Boston-area, was used for biomarker discovery. Data was split 3:1 into training and test datasets. Elastic net hyperparameter optimization with five-fold cross validation and model fiting was conducted on the training data set. Performance of the resulting model was evaluated in the test data. Data splitting and model fitting was repeated over 1,000 iterations. Performance metrics and the features selected by the model were collected for each iteration. Two approaches were employed: (1) a locus-by-locus analysis and (2) an analysis based on the average methylation values across CpG-dense regions identified via Hidden Markov modeling. Biomarker panels for each approach were selected to optimize predicted performance and parsimony. The identified biomarker panels were externally validated for discriminatory performance using tissue biopsy methylation data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Additionally, the biomarker panels were evaluated for their ability to predict recurrence in post-treatment oral rinse samples collected at the University of Cincinnati, which were interogated using the Illumina HumanMethylation EPIC BeadChip. Results: To optimize accuracy while maintaining model simplicity, biomarker panels derived from an α = 0.7 within the elastic net model were selected for further analysis. The individual CpG panel consisted of 14 CpG loci, while the CpG-dense region panel contained 10 CpG-dense regions. Validation using HNSCC methylation data from TCGA demonstrated high discriminatory performance, with AUCs of 0.97 (95% CI: 0.92–1.00) for the CpG-dense region panel and 0.99 (95% CI: 0.97–1.00) for the individual CpG panel. Prospective prediction of recurrence was more modest, with AUCs ranging from 0.83 (95% CI: 0.64 – 1) for the CpG-dense region panel to 0.76 (95% CI: 0.40 – 1) for the individual CpG panel when restricted to patients with a recurrence < 6 months prior to the last provided sample. Conclusions: The biomarker panels demonstrated excellent performance in distinguishing tumor tissue from paired normal tissue using TCGA data, with promise in predicting recurrence in post-treatment oral rinse samples. These DNA methylation biomarker panels may provide a novel screening method for HNSCC diagnosis or early identification of recurrence. Citation Format: Alexander C. Sprague, Damaris Kuhnell, Wei-Wen Hsu, Trisha Wise-Draper, Scott Langevin. Elastic net discovery of DNA methylation biomarkers for non-invasive diagnosis and recurrence detection in head and neck cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning; 2025 Jul 10-12; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2025;31(13_Suppl):Abstract nr B051.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.111
GPT teacher head0.477
Teacher spread0.366 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Cancer ResearchSame topicGene expression and cancer classificationFrench-language works237,207