MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract A014: Machine Learning-Guided Discovery of Drug Combinations Targeting PI3K and mTOR Pathways Using Cell Line and PDX Data

2025· article· en· W4412163802 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yuan-Hung Chien, Raffaella Pippa, W. Andrews, Long Do

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cancer Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPI3K/AKT/mTOR pathwayDrug discoveryComputational biologyMedicineBioinformaticsBiologySignal transductionCell biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Combinational cancer therapies can overcome drug resistance, minimize dosage and toxicity, and enhance therapeutic efficacy. However, identifying effective drug combinations remains a significant challenge. Although machine learning (ML) models trained on high-throughput screening data offer a promising strategy, their clinical translation is often limited by discrepancies between in vitro cell line data and patient outcomes. In this study, we present a novel approach that improves the predictive performance of ML models by incorporating pharmacological data from patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models, which more accurately reflect clinical responses. Leveraging gene expression profiles, drug structure information, and ML models based on the high throughput datasets, we predicted effective drug combinations on proprietary PDX models developed at Certic Oncology. Drug combinations targeting the PI3K and mTOR pathways consistently ranked among top candidates across multiple KRAS G12 mutant models, including those derived from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and gastric cancer. We experimentally evaluated six PI3K inhibitors and four mTOR inhibitors across 13 KRAS G12 mutant PDX models spanning lung, gastric, pancreatic, and colorectal cancers. These results enabled the selection of seven gene biomarkers for further ML model refinement. Retraining the models with PDX-derived data and the expression profiles of the biomarkers significantly improved the predictive accuracy, achieving a Pearson’s correlation coefficient of 0.63 in forecasting the efficacy of PI3K–mTOR combinations on novel KRAS G12 PDX models. Notably, the combination of everolimus and alpelisib—prioritized by our model—has been independently validated in literature and is currently in clinical trials for solid tumors. Citation Format: Yuan-Hung Chien, Raffaella Pippa, Warren Andrews, Long Do. Machine Learning-Guided Discovery of Drug Combinations Targeting PI3K and mTOR Pathways Using Cell Line and PDX Data [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning; 2025 Jul 10-12; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2025;31(13_Suppl):Abstract nr A014.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.265
GPT teacher head0.552
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Cancer Research→Same topicLung Cancer Treatments and Mutations→French-language works237,207→