MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract A044: Developing a digital twin framework for colorectal cancer outcome prediction and robust clinical trial simulation

2025· article· en· W4412163818 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ian Ruchlin, Mirella L. Altoé, Maria E. Monberg, Todd Oakland, M. Rossi, Vivek Agarwal, Jitesh Chawla, Pyeush Gurha, Stephen Yip

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cancer Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsColorectal cancerOutcome (game theory)MedicineClinical trialCancerOncologyInternal medicineMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Digital twin (DT) technology enables in silico patient representations for counterfactual outcome simulations and precise target population identification, thereby facilitating in silico hypothesis testing while reducing clinical trial costs and resource utilization. We present a novel DT framework for colorectal cancer (CRC) patient outcome prediction and clinical trial simulation. Methods: We used multiomics data from 2,100 CRC patients from our Precision 360™ database. The data were partitioned into training (80%), validation (10%), and testing (10%) cohorts. The DT architecture incorporates an encoder-decoder neural network framework that compresses patient data into latent vectors (serving as digital twins) and subsequently decodes clinically relevant observables including overall survival (OS). Training employed a self-supervised approach with dual optimization criteria: minimization of reconstruction loss and maximization of latent space entropy. Training proceeded for 10,000 epochs until convergence of validation and training curves. We conducted two validation experiments related to AST/ALT ratio, a parameter shown to be associated with overall survival: (1) to assess how well the DT could generate prognosis-related hypotheses, we compared the predictions made by the DT and those from univariate analysis between AST/ALT ratio at baseline (closet lab value after initial diagnosis) and OS using concordance indices (CI); and (2) evaluation of counterfactual stability through simulated AST/ALT manipulations across a spectrum from low to high values. Results: Among the CRC cohort, data demonstrated AST/ALT > 0.96 was associated with median OS=31±4 months versus AST/ALT < 0.96 with median OS=38±4 months (c-index=0.57, log-rank p<0.005). In the test set, DT-decoded survival predictions exhibited improved prognostic accuracy with c-index=0.60 (log-rank p<0.015). In counterfactual simulations, systematic AST/ALT modulation from low to high values (AST/ALT= 0.37, 1.0, 2.7) produced corresponding decreases in median OS from 37±3, 35±3, to 34±3 months, with intermediate AST/ALT values following the monotonic relationship. Conclusion: Our encoder-decoder based DT framework robustly simulates CRC patient outcomes and predicts survival outcomes. The model maintains consistent trends during counterfactual analysis. Further, the DT framework shows considerable potential in revealing subtle relationships between potential features such as AST/ALT and survival outcomes. This ability to generate new prognostic insights paves the way for hypothesis formation for future studies. As such, our framework could prove to be a valuable tool for clinical trial simulation and insight generation, potentially reducing unnecessary costs and adverse effects in CRC drug development and management. Citation Format: Ian Ruchlin, Mirella Altoe, Maria Monberg, Todd Oakland, Michael Rossi, Vivek Agarwal, Jitesh Chawla, Pyeush Gurha, Stephen Yip. Developing a digital twin framework for colorectal cancer outcome prediction and robust clinical trial simulation [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning; 2025 Jul 10-12; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2025;31(13_Suppl):Abstract nr A044.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.352
GPT teacher head0.615
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Cancer ResearchSame topicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingFrench-language works237,207