MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract B027: Multimodal prediction of pathological complete response in esophageal cancer using automated machine learning and variational autoencoder-based synthetic data augmentation

2025· article· en· W4412163829 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Şefika Dinçer, Taylan Tuğrul, Mahmut Kara, Mehmet Naci Aldemir

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cancer Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutoencoderPathologicalArtificial intelligenceEsophageal cancerMedicineMachine learningCancerComputer sciencePattern recognition (psychology)Deep learningPathologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in esophageal cancer is a clinically meaningful endpoint associated with improved survival. However, predicting pCR remains difficult due to small sample sizes and the high dimensionality of imaging and treatment-related data. This study presents a multimodal framework that integrates variational autoencoder (VAE)-based data augmentation with automated machine learning (AutoML) to improve the robustness and interpretability of pCR prediction. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 89 esophageal cancer patients (44 pCR-positive, 45 pCR-negative) treated with curative-intent chemoradiotherapy between 2021 and 2024. Features were extracted from three sources: (1) clinical variables (e.g., age, gender, nodal stage, tumor location, treatment protocol), (2) radiomic and dosiomic features from planning CT and dose distributions within planning target volumes (PTVs), and (3) dose-volume parameters from tumor and elective field contours. All features were preprocessed using standard scaling and one-hot encoding.To address data scarcity and class imbalance, class-conditional VAEs were trained separately on pCR-positive and pCR-negative groups to generate 20 synthetic patients per class, expanding the dataset to 129 samples. We assessed distributional similarity between real and synthetic data using Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) for visualization and Kolmogorov–Smirnov (KS) tests for statistical comparison. The Tree-based Pipeline Optimization Tool (TPOT), a genetic programming–based AutoML framework, was used for model selection and hyperparameter tuning. Feature importance was evaluated using SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) values and LinearSVC coefficients. Results: On real data, TPOT identified XGBoost as the best-performing model (AUC = 0.61). After VAE-based augmentation, the optimal model changed to LinearSVC, which achieved the same AUC (0.61) using only five features, improving model interpretability. UMAP analysis showed partial embedding overlap between real and synthetic data, supporting the realism of the generated samples. KS analysis demonstrated significantly higher distributional similarity for radiomic and dosiomic features (mean KS ≈ 0.31, p < 0.05) compared to clinical and dose-volume variables (mean KS = 0.62, p < 0.001), indicating greater reproducibility of imaging-based biomarkers. The radiomic feature LowGrayLevelZoneEmphasis remained significantly associated with pCR in the real cohort ( p = 0.0072), suggesting translational relevance. Conclusion: This study highlights a novel approach combining synthetic data generation and AutoML for pCR prediction in esophageal cancer. The findings support the utility of radiomic and dosiomic features and demonstrate that VAE-augmented modeling may provide a scalable solution for predictive modeling in data-limited oncology settings. Citation Format: Şefika Dinçer, Taylan Tuğrul, Mahmut Kara, Mehmet Naci. Aldemir. Multimodal prediction of pathological complete response in esophageal cancer using automated machine learning and variational autoencoder-based synthetic data augmentation [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning; 2025 Jul 10-12; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2025;31(13_Suppl):Abstract nr B027.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.235
GPT teacher head0.544
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Cancer Research→Same topicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging→French-language works237,207→