MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract A054: Multimodal LLM-Driven Intervention for Precision Risk Prediction in Lung Cancer Surgery

2025· article· en· W4412163852 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Shubham Pandey, Bhavin Jawade, Srirangaraj Setlur, Venugopal Govindaraju, Kenneth P. Seastedt

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cancer Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLung cancerIntervention (counseling)CancerSurgeryOncologyInternal medicineNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Lung cancer surgery, while potentially curative, carries a 30% risk of serious postoperative complications, such as pneumonia or respiratory failure, increasing morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Traditional risk assessment tools, based on static scores or clinical judgment, lack precision and adaptability to identify high-risk patients or reassess surgical candidacy. These tools also fail to provide interpretable outputs aligned with surgical workflows, limiting their clinical utility. To address these gaps, we propose a novel multimodal deep learning framework integrating clinical variables, imaging-derived radiomic features, and large language model (LLM) insights to predict complications accurately. Our model generates editable, clinician-friendly risk summaries, enhancing transparency, trust, and personalized surgical decision-making to improve outcomes and optimize planning. Methods: We analyzed data from 3,440 lung cancer surgery patients, combining 17 preoperative clinical variables (e.g., age, smoking history, pulmonary function) with CT imaging from 3,205 cases. From these scans, 113 radiomic features (e.g., texture, shape) were extracted using PyRadiomics. Our model integrates three modules: (1) a clinical data encoder, (2) a radiomics module for imaging-based risk, and (3) an LLM-based interpreter (using Llama 3.3, DeepSeek R1-Distil, OpenBioLLM, Clinical Longformer) to generate surgeon-like risk narratives from unstructured data. These narratives, linked to a binary postoperative pulmonary complication outcome, allow real-time edits that update risk predictions, reflecting surgeon expertise. The model was trained with a hybrid loss balancing accuracy and usability and evaluated using AUC-ROC. Results: Benchmarking traditional machine learning models (e.g., logistic regression, random forests) on our dataset yielded AUC-ROC values ranging from 76.8-78.2%. Our multimodal framework achieved an AUC-ROC of 75.0%, comparable to baseline models, while also providing interactive interpretable risk summaries not possible in baseline models that enable surgeons to refine predictions based on clinical expertise. Human surgeon assessments had a True Positive Rate of 44.9% and a False Positive Rate of 20.0%, underscoring our model’s prediction precision. Editable risk summaries allow surgeons to adjust predictions in real-time, enhancing transparency and supporting personalized surgical decisions. Conclusions: Our multimodal framework transforms preoperative risk assessment in lung cancer surgery by integrating clinical data, radiomic features, and LLM-driven insights. It surpasses human judgment and competes with traditional risk tools in predictive precision while offering exceptional interpretability through editable, clinician-friendly outputs. By enabling real-time risk adjustments, the model supports dynamic surgical planning, reduces complications, and enhances patient-specific care in lung cancer, with the potential to improve resource allocation and support AI-augmented precision medicine in thoracic oncology. Citation Format: Shubham Pandey, Bhavin Jawade, Srirangaraj Setlur, Venugopal Govindaraju, Kenneth P. Seastedt. Multimodal LLM-Driven Intervention for Precision Risk Prediction in Lung Cancer Surgery [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning; 2025 Jul 10-12; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2025;31(13_Suppl):Abstract nr A054.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.114
GPT teacher head0.559
Teacher spread0.446 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Cancer Research→Same topicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging→French-language works237,207→