MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract A058: Multimodal generative AI jointly learns pathology and clinical data to synthesize a multinational lung cancer cohort

2025· article· en· W4412163875 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hanna M. Hieromnimon, V. Miskovic, Matteo Antonio Sacco, A. Ferrarin, Laura Mazzeo, A. Spagnoletti, Monica Ganzinelli, Cecilia Silvestri, Leonardo Provenzano, Claudia Proto, Nir Peled, Enriqueta Felip, Helena Linardou, Martin Reck, Francesco Trovò, Giuseppe Lo Russo, Marina Chiara Garassino, Samantha J. Riesenfeld, Alexander T. Pearson, Arsela Prelaj

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cancer Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAI in cancer detection
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLung cancerCohortCancerMedicineMultinational corporationPathologyGenerative grammarComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceInternal medicineBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Machine learning models require large, diverse datasets which can be challenging to acquire, even more so for multimodal and paired histology data. Within the I3LUNG European Funded project (NCT05537922), we evaluated multimodal synthetic data generation as a solution to enable domain-specific pretraining and imputation in NSCLC patients treated with immunotherapy (IO) using multimodal data. Methods: Our two-stage method included multimodal data simulation and AI-enabled data evaluation. First, a cross-modal autoencoder jointly embedded histology foundation model features with key clinical features: PD-L1 expression, smoking status, baseline ECOG performance status, histologic subtype, gender, metastatic sites, progression and survival events, LDH, BMI, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and progression free survival (PFS). The joint latent spaced was sampled using a Gaussian Copula model to generate synthetic patients with coherent multimodal features. Second, to evaluate the fidelity of synthetic clinical representations, we trained a deep neural network models using Cox proportional hazards endpoints on real and simulated data to predict PFS, validating on held-out real patient data. Additionally, we used HistoXGAN to generate paired histology tile images for each synthetic patient. Results: We analyzed NSCLC patients (N=1813) treated with immunotherapy from five centers, split into training (n=1630) and test (n=183) cohorts. The synthetic data matched the original distributions, with minimal differences in continuous features (t-test p > 0.05 and mean differences: BMI -1.72%, PFS -0.37%, LDH -9.18%) and categorical ones (chi-square p > 0.05 and maximum class proportion differences of 3.9%, 15.5%, and 1.2% for bone metastasis, PD-L1 expression, and smoking history respectively). Models trained on synthetic data (N=1000) performed similarly to real data. In validation, the Cox model trained on synthetic data achieved a c-index of 0.683, versus 0.679 for real data (0.6% relative difference). Both synthetic and real data identified consistent prognostic factors (HR [95% CI]): bone metastases (real: 2.36 [1.39-4.80], synthetic: 2.46 [1.39-3.77]), LDH (real: 1.60 [1.16-2.69], synthetic: 1.48 [1.22-2.39]), and liver metastases (real: 1.52 [1.24-3.69], synthetic: 1.46 [1.11-2.80]). Conclusions: Our multimodal synthetic data successfully captured complex multi-feature relationships predictive of PFS in NSCLC patients treated with IO. Synthetic data enables cross-institutional model development while increasing patient privacy, with minimal impact on model performance. This approach paves the way for data democratization, fostering rapid collaboration and mutual validation of AI algorithms. Citation Format: Hanna M. Hieromnimon, Vanja Miskovic, Matteo Sacco, Alberto Ferrarin, Laura Mazzeo, Andrea Spagnoletti, Monica Ganzinelli, Cecilia Silvestri, Leonardo Provenzano, Claudia Proto, Nir Peled, Enriqueta Felip, Helena Linardou, Martin Reck, Francesco Trovo, Giuseppe Lo Russo, Marina Chiara. Garassino, Samantha J. Riesenfeld, Alexander T. Pearson, Arsela Prelaj. Multimodal generative AI jointly learns pathology and clinical data to synthesize a multinational lung cancer cohort [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning; 2025 Jul 10-12; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2025;31(13_Suppl):Abstract nr A058.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.260
GPT teacher head0.577
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Cancer Research→Same topicAI in cancer detection→French-language works237,207→