MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract A046: Cell states and neighborhoods in distinct clinical stages of primary and metastatic esophageal adenocarcinoma

2025· article· en· W4412163881 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Josephine Yates, Camille Mathey-Andrews, Jihye Park, Amanda Garza, Andréanne Gagné, Samantha E. Hoffman, Kevin Bi, Breanna Titchen, Connor J. Hennessey, Joshua Remland, Matthew L. Carnes, Erin Shannon, Sabrina Y. Camp, Siddhi Balamurali, Shweta Kiran Cavale, Zhixin Li, Akhouri Kishore Raghawan, Agnieszka Kraft, Genevieve M. Boland, Andrew J. Aguirre, Nilay S. Sethi, Valentina Boeva, Eliezer M. Van Allen

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cancer Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEsophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEsophageal adenocarcinomaAdenocarcinomaMedicinePrimary (astronomy)OncologyEsophageal cancerCancer researchInternal medicineCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is a highly lethal cancer of the upper gastrointestinal tract with rising incidence in western populations. To decipher EAC disease progression and therapeutic response, we performed multiomic analyses of a cohort of primary and metastatic EAC tumors, incorporating single-nuclei transcriptomic and chromatin accessibility sequencing, along with spatial profiling. We recovered tumor microenvironmental features previously described to associate with therapy response. We subsequently identified five malignant cell programs, including undifferentiated, intermediate, differentiated, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, and cycling programs, which were associated with differential epigenetic plasticity and clinical outcomes, and for which we inferred candidate transcription factor regulons. Furthermore, we revealed diverse spatial localizations of malignant cells expressing their associated transcriptional programs and predicted their significant interactions with microenvironmental cell types. We validated our findings in three external single-cell RNA-seq and three bulk RNA-seq studies. Altogether, our findings advance the understanding of EAC heterogeneity, disease progression, and therapeutic response. Citation Format: Josephine Yates, Camille Mathey-Andrews, Jihye Park, Amanda Garza, Andreanne Gagne, Samantha Hoffman, Kevin Bi, Breanna Titchen, Connor Hennessey, Joshua Remland, Matthew Carnes, Erin Shannon, Sabrina Camp, Siddhi Balamurali, Shweta Kiran Cavale, Zhixin Li, Akhouri Kishore Raghawan, Agnieszka Kraft, Genevieve Boland, Andrew J. Aguirre, Nilay S. Sethi, Valentina Boeva, Eliezer M. Van Allen. Cell states and neighborhoods in distinct clinical stages of primary and metastatic esophageal adenocarcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning; 2025 Jul 10-12; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2025;31(13_Suppl):Abstract nr A046.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.144
GPT teacher head0.511
Teacher spread0.367 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Cancer ResearchSame topicEsophageal Cancer Research and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207