Vidas projetadas e currículos neoliberais
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Neste artigo, propõe-se a refletir sobre os modos de subjetivação que funcionam nos discursos dos livros didáticos de Projeto de Vida, a partir dos quais podem constituir-se modos de ser atrelados ao avanço de uma razão neoliberal nos currículos. Em um primeiro momento, traça-se um referencial teórico que articula diálogos sobre os impactos do neoliberalismo e da teoria do capital humano na educação, a partir de Foucault e Laval. Em seguida, com base nesse referencial, seis materiais didáticos do componente curricular Projeto de Vida, editados pela Editora Moderna, são objeto das análises. Como resultado, observa-se que os modos de subjetivação em funcionamento nos discursos conduzem a formas de ser sujeito empreendedor de si, disposto a atualizar-se constantemente, a saber reconhecer suas habilidades e seus saberes e a mobilizá-los de acordo com as necessidades do mercado de trabalho.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".