MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412166536 · doi:10.1017/cjn.2025.10306

P.160 Convexity dermoid cyst: a case report and review of the literature

2025· article· en· W4412166536 on OpenAlexaffvenue
B Newton, Patrick Toyota, V Zherebitskiy, Adam Wu, Luke Hnenny

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTeratomas and Epidermoid Cysts
Canadian institutionsSaskatoon Medical Imaging
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDermoid cystConvexityMedicineAnatomyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Dermoid cysts are rare benign intracranial lesions arising from abnormal neuroectodermal folding during embryogenesis. While typically midline, near the sella or posterior fossa, we report an unusual case of a convexity dermoid cyst extending into the sylvian fissure. Methods: A 33-year-old female with a left convexity mass underwent resection, confirming a dermoid cyst. A literature review was also conducted. Results: The patient presented with progressive, intermittent right-sided hand and face paresthesias. CT showed a 4.3 × 4.7 cm hypodense lesion with peripheral calcification contiguous with the calvarium. MRI revealed an extra-axial, T2-hyperintense, T1-hypointense lesion with internal septations extending from the calvarium into the sylvian fissure. Craniotomy achieved gross total resection, revealing a soft lesion with interwoven hair, suggestive of a dermoid cyst. Pathology confirmed a cystic lesion with mature squamous epithelium, keratin, skin appendages, and chronic inflammation. Conclusions: Dermoid cysts are rare intracranial lesions that most commonly occur in the midline. This case highlights a rare convexity dermoid cyst, expanding our understanding of its atypical locations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0080.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences NeurologiquesSame topicTeratomas and Epidermoid CystsFrench-language works237,207