P.033 Long-term efficacy of Efgartigimod PH20 SC in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: interim results from the ADHERE+ study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Efgartigimod, a human immunoglobulin (Ig)G1 antibody Fc fragment, blocks the neonatal Fc receptor, reducing IgGs involved in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). The multi-stage, double-blinded, placebo-controlled ADHERE (NCT04281472) and open-label extension ADHERE+ (NCT04280718) trials (interim analysis cutoff: February 16, 2024) assessed efgartigimod PH20 SC in participants with CIDP. Methods: Participants with active CIDP received open-label, weekly efgartigimod PH20 SC 1000 mg during ≤12-week run-in (stage-A). Responders were randomized (1:1) to efgartigimod or placebo for ≤48 weeks (stage-B). Participants with clinical deterioration in stage-B or who completed ADHERE entered ADHERE+. Week 36 changes from run-in baseline (CFB) in adjusted Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (aINCAT), Inflammatory Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale (I-RODS), and grip strength scores were evaluated. Results: Of 322 stage-A participants, 221 were randomized and treated in stage-B, and 99% entered ADHERE+. Mean CFB (SE) in aINCAT, I-RODS, and grip strength scores were -1.2 (0.15) and 8.8 (1.46) and 17.5 (2.02), respectively, at ADHERE+ Week 36 (N=150). Half the participants with clinical deterioration during ADHERE stage-B restabilized on efgartigimod from ADHERE+ Week 4. Conclusions: Interim results from ADHERE+ indicate long-term effectiveness of efgartigimod PH20 SC in clinical outcomes in participants with CIDP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".