MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4412166574 · doi:10.1017/cjn.2025.10249

P.089 Multiscale analysis of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy: Anatomo-Electrophysio-pathologic differentiation

2025· article· en· W4412166574 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
P. Narayanan Nambiar, H. W. Gray, Khalid Al-Orabi, Jennifer Y. F. Lau, Arun Thurairajah, Abidullah Khan

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEpilepsy research and treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMesial temporal lobe epilepsyEpilepsyTemporal lobePsychologyNeuroscienceMedicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (mTLE) is a heterogenous condition with variable post-surgical outcomes. Combining high resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) and histology may establish different subtypes of mTLE. Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients with mTLE with 1) SEEG Patterns 2) MRI 3) Post temporal lobectomy tissue analysis 4) Engel Classification. HippUnfold method was used to segment hippocampus on MRI. Results: Of 109 patients investigated with SEEG, 11 patients were analyzed so far. Low voltage fast activity was seen in 215 seizures, low-frequency periodic spikes in 21, sharp activity at <13 Hz in 58, rhythmic spike sharp wave activity in 86, and other types were less frequent. MRI revealed unilateral mesial temporal sclerosis (MTS) in 6 (54.55%), bilateral MTS in 2 (18.18%), and was normal in 3 (27.27%) patients. Histopathology showed ILAE grade I in 3 (37.5 %), II in 4 (50 %), IV in 1 (12.5%) patient. 63.63% had Engel Class I at 6 months. HippUnfold analysis and SEEG electrode coregistration was done in one patient and will be attempted in the rest. Conclusions: Our study highlights a strong correlation between SEEG findings and histological analysis in mTLE. A multidimensional classification will help predict long term outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques→Same topicEpilepsy research and treatment→French-language works237,207→