P.072 Safety and effectiveness of Nipocalimab in adolescent participants in the open label phase 2/3 Vibrance-mg clinical study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Nipocalimab (a fully human, effectorless anti-neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) monoclonal antibody) may ameliorate gMG disease manifestations by selectively targeting FcRn IgG recycling and lowering IgG, including pathogenic autoantibodies in generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG). The objective was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of intravenous nipocalimab added to background standard-of-care therapy in adolescents with gMG. Methods: Seropositive patients (12-<18 years) with gMG (MGFA Class II-IV) on stable therapy but inadequately controlled, were enrolled in a 24-week open label study. Nipocalimab was administered as a 30 mg/kg IV loading dose followed by 15 mg/kg IV every 2 Weeks. Results: Seven adolescents were enrolled; 5 completed 24-weeks of dosing. The mean(SD) age was 14.1(1.86) years; seven were anti-AChR+, six were female. Mean(SD) baseline MG-ADL/QMG scores were 4.29(2.430)/12.50(3.708). Nipocalimab showed a significant reduction in total serum IgG at week-24; the mean(SD) change from baseline to week-24 for total serum IgG was -68.98%(7.561). The mean(SD) change in MG-ADL/QMG scores at week-24 was -2.40(0.418)/-3.80(2.683); 4 of 5 patients achieved minimum symptom expression (MG-ADL score 0-1) by week-24. Nipocalimab was well-tolerated; there were no serious adverse events. There were no clinically meaningful laboratory changes. Conclusions: Nipocalimab demonstrated efficacy and safety in this 6-month trial in seropositive adolescents with gMG.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.021 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".