P.093 A case of refractory NF155 Paranodal CIDP with near-complete spontaneous recovery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: CIDP is a rare immune-mediated demyelinating neuropathy that has significant phenotypic variability. A unifying immunopathological mechanism remains elusive, likely due to etiological heterogeneity among the variant presentations. This is best exemplified by the identification of nodal/paranodal antibodies, such as neurofascin 155, in a subgroup of CIDP patients who present with a distinct phenotype. Methods: We present the case of a 39-year-old male who presented with a 2-year history of progressive stocking-glove sensory loss and sensory ataxia. Electrodiagnostics confirmed an acquired demyelinating neuropathy, with serum anti-NF155 IgG4. His case was refractory to standard immunomodulatory therapy, including adequate trials of IVIG, steroids, azathioprine, and rituximab. He also had a non-therapeutic trial of PLEX, methotrexate, and tacrolimus. Results: After cessation of all immunomodulatory therapy for 2 years, he had spontaneous remission of his CIDP and near-complete resolution of electrodiagnostic/clinical abnormalities. Conclusions: This case provides insights into the natural history of NF155 “paranodalopathy” and highlights a unique case of supra-refractory CIDP which underwent spontaneous remission with near-complete resolution. Delayed effect from rituximab was posited as a contributor, however, the patient had no clinical or electrophysiological improvement 20-months after initiation of anti-CD20 therapy. Current data suggests the majority of CIDP patients respond to rituximab within 6-12 months.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".