Influence of Ginsenosides on the Pathogenicity of <i>Ilyonectria</i> spp.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Commercial cultivation of American ginseng ( Panax quinquefolius L.) suffers from ginseng replant disease (GRD) when planted in a former ginseng garden. GRD typically manifests as a severe root rot due to the fungus Ilyonectria mors‐panacis (A.A. Hildebr.) A. Cabral & Crous. Ginsenosides released to the soil by ginseng are thought to contribute to GRD mainly through the alteration of soil microbial communities. However, ginsenosides do not persist in ginseng garden soil post‐harvest, suggesting that they are not direct contributors during GRD. Instead, ginsenosides can alter the virulence of Ilyonectria spp., specifically I. rufa A. Cabral & Crous, toward ginseng roots when pre‐exposed to ginsenosides in vitro. Although I. rufa infection has not been previously implicated in GRD, a similar mechanism may occur in I. mors‐panacis , thereby suggesting that ginsenosides may contribute to establishing the GRD state. Additionally, while various Ilyonectria isolates were able to metabolise select ginsenosides, this did not correlate with virulence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it