MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412173896 · doi:10.1227/neu.0000000000003611

The Silk Vista Baby Study: A Multicenter Aneurysm Report From North America and Europe

2025· article· en· W4412173896 on OpenAlexaff
Ricardó A. Hanel, Otavio F. De Toledo, Natália Vasconcellos de Oliveira Souza, Salvador F. Gutierrez‐Aguirre, Monika Killer‐Oberpfalzer, Eytan Raz, Maksim Shapiro, Tareq Kass‐Hout, Michael C. Hurley, Rami Z. Morsi, Visish M. Srinivasan, Brian T. Jankowitz, Pierce Davis, Adnan Siddiqui, Vinay Jaikumar, Gustavo M Cortez, Omar Kass‐Hout, Tibor Becske, Ramesh Grandhi, Craig Kilburg, Demetrius K. Lopes, Andrew F. Ducruet, Lucas Elijovich, Gavin W. Britz, Maria Toledo, Joshua Seinfeld, Robert M. Starke, Raul G. Nogueira, Matthew T. Bender, Peter Kan, Tyler Lazaro, Victor H. C. Benalia, Fernanda R. Erazu, Montserrat Lara‐Velazquez, Eric Sauvageau, Vítor Mendes Pereira

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurosurgery · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAneurysmMulticenter studySILKSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The Silk Vista Baby (SVB) flow diverter (FD) stent (Balt SAS) is the first device designed for treating distally located brain aneurysms. It can be delivered through a 0.017-inch ID microcatheter, enabling access to small, distal vessels. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, technical success, occlusion rate, and clinical outcomes of the SVB device. METHODS: This retrospective, multicenter study included data from 18 centers from November 2023 to September 2024. Procedures were performed by experienced neurointerventionalists following institutional standards of care. Outcomes analyzed included effectiveness, safety, and aneurysm occlusion rates. Descriptive analyses and Pearson χ 2 or Independent t -Test were used for statistical evaluation. RESULTS: A total of 95 patients, mean age 55.4 years, were included. A total of 31% of aneurysms were ruptured at admission. Most (58.3%) were located in the anterior circulation, and 45% had previous treatment, mainly coiling (69.4%). Complication rates were higher for ruptured aneurysms (24.1%) compared with unruptured ones (9.2%). Two deaths occurred, 1 (1.1%) related to the procedure. At discharge, 87% of patients had modified Rankin Scale ≤2. The latest follow-up showed overall complete/near-complete occlusion rates of 76.1%, with 81.14% for ruptured and 73.43% for unruptured aneurysms. Technical success was higher in unruptured cases (100% vs 93.1%). CONCLUSION: Our case series demonstrated the efficacy of the SVB with a high rate of technical success. The occlusion rates for ruptured cases are comparable with those of other FDs. However, the rates are lower for unruptured cases. This discrepancy is likely due to the characteristics of the aneurysms, particularly in the presence of side branches in bifurcation lesions. The SVB safety profile is similar to other FDs in unruptured cases, while the ruptured group presented more complications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurosurgerySame topicIntracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and ComplicationsFrench-language works237,207