MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412174878 · doi:10.1186/s40337-025-01332-9

Measurement invariance of a brief disordered eating scale in a large sample of secondary school students in Canada

2025· article· en· W4412174878 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Zheng Lin, William Pickett, Jianjun Liu, Scott T. Leatherdale, Karen A. Patte

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Eating Disorders · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicEating Disorders and Behaviors
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooQueen's UniversityBrock University
FundersCanadian Centre on Substance Use and AddictionInstitute of Population and Public HealthInstitute of Nutrition, Metabolism and DiabetesInstitute of Human Development, Child and Youth HealthCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchHealth Canada
KeywordsMeasurement invarianceScale (ratio)Sample (material)Disordered eatingScale invariancePsychologyMathematics educationStatisticsGeographyMathematicsPhysicsClinical psychologyEating disordersCartographyStructural equation modelingConfirmatory factor analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For use in population-level surveys, there is a need for brief measures of disordered eating (DE) that demonstrate validity among diverse adolescents. This study aimed to (1) assess the measurement invariance of a short DE scale among high school students in Canada, and (2) estimate differences in scale scores across student sociodemographic subgroups. We used student-level survey data collected during the 2021/2022 school year in the COMPASS study. The sample included 24,639 students in grades 9–12 from 69 secondary schools in Alberta, British Columbia, and Ontario, Canada. Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis was applied to assess measurement invariance (i.e., configural, metric, scalar, and strict invariance) of the 6-item DE scale, and one-way ANOVA and mixed linear regression were implemented to estimate scale score differences across population subgroups (by grade, gender, race and ethnicity, family affluence, and weight status). Results demonstrated full measurement invariance of the DE scale across student sociodemographic subgroups. Higher sum scale scores indicated greater engagement in DE thoughts or behaviours. Students in higher school grade (e.g., grade 12), transgender and gender diverse youth, and cisgender girls reported higher DE scores compared to their grade 9 and cisgender boy peers. Elevated DE scores were also observed among adolescents of Middle Eastern and Another or Multiethnic identity, students with less affluent households, and those with higher body weights, relative to their White, more affluent, and relatively lower weight peers, respectively. Results indicate the DE scale measures the same construct across various subgroups of adolescents, providing confidence that differences in scale scores found by grade, gender, race and ethnicity, affluence, and weight reflect actual differences in DE rather than artifactual differences in scale interpretation. This scale warrants additional psychometric testing as a promising brief DE measure suitable for large population-level youth surveys. Our results provide important new evidence from a large contemporary sample of adolescents demonstrating elevated risk of DE among specific subgroups and emphasizing the need for targeted interventions. This study tested a new short measure of disordered eating (DE) for use in survey research among adolescents. The goal was to ensure the questionnaire works consistently across different groups of students, including boys, girls, transgender and gender diverse (TGD) youth, and students from different grades, racial and ethnic backgrounds, family income levels, and body sizes. Using data from over 24,000 students in grades 9 to 12 at 69 secondary schools in Canada, we found support for use of the DE measure across all groups. The measure appears to assess DE in the same way for all students, which means that any differences in DE scores between groups likely reflect real differences in DE thoughts and behaviours, and not different interpretations of the questions. Some groups of students were more likely to report DE than others. Groups at increased risk of reporting DE included older students, girls, TGD youth, and students from lower-income families, with higher body weights, and of Middle Eastern and Another/Multiethnic backgrounds. Overall, the study suggests that this brief DE measure could be useful for large youth health surveys. It also highlights the importance of providing extra support for the groups at greater risk of DE.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.308
Threshold uncertainty score0.857

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Eating DisordersSame topicEating Disorders and BehaviorsFrench-language works237,207