MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412175179 · doi:10.6000/1929-6029.2025.14.34

Structural Equation Modeling of Oral Stomatitis and Its Determinants among the Sundanese Ethnic Group: Evidence from IFLS-5

2025· article· en· W4412175179 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Abu Bakar, Yessa Afri Diana Fitri, Dhona Afriza, Utmi Arma, Darmawangsa Darmawangsa, Valendriyani Ningrum

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Statistics in Medical Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDentistry
TopicOral Health Pathology and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEthnic groupStructural equation modelingPsychologySociologyMathematicsAnthropologyStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Oral stomatitis is an inflammation of the mucosa in various oral structures such as cheeks, gums, tongue, lips, palate, and floor of the mouth that commonly occurs in communities, including among the Sundanese ethnic group. Risk factors affecting stomatitis incidence in the Sundanese population need to be analyzed for developing more effective prevention programs. Aim: To analyze risk factors for stomatitis among the Sundanese population using panel data from the Indonesian Family Life Survey (IFLS). Method: This was an analytical observational study using secondary data from IFLS-5. The research design employed structural equation modelling (SEM) analysis examining variables including age, gender, education, residential area classification, general health status, and smoking habits. Results: The study revealed that age and general health variables had significant associations with stomatitis occurrence (p<0,001). Ages below 25 years and suboptimal health conditions proved to be significant factors influencing increased stomatitis incidence. Meanwhile, gender, education level, residential area classification, and smoking habits showed no significant correlation. Conclusion: Age and general health status are the main risk factors for stomatitis occurrence among the Sundanese population, which can serve as a reference for prevention program development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.440
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.219
GPT teacher head0.541
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Statistics in Medical ResearchSame topicOral Health Pathology and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207