MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412186851 · doi:10.1039/d5nr02432c

A magnetic hybrid sol–gel ionic network catalyst for direct alcohol esterification under solvent-free conditions

2025· article· en· W4412186851 on OpenAlexaff
Maryam Faraji, Fariborz Mansouri, Babak Karimi, Hojatollah Vali

Bibliographic record

VenueNanoscale · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicChemical Synthesis and Reactions
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersInstitute for Advanced Studies in Basic SciencesIran National Science FoundationAlexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
KeywordsCatalysisAlcoholIonic liquidSolventIonic bondingChemistryChemical engineeringSol-gelMaterials scienceOrganic chemistryNanotechnologyIon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

adsorption-desorption, CHNS elemental analysis, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and vibrating sample magnetometry (VSM). Optimization experiments demonstrated that the best results were achieved in the esterification of both primary and secondary alcohols with acetic acid (5-7 equivalents), using as little as 0.1 mol% of the catalyst at 85 °C under solvent-free conditions. Under these optimized conditions, the developed catalyst demonstrated exceptional catalytic activity, selectivity, water resistance, and durability in the direct esterification of primary and secondary benzylic, aliphatic, and cyclic alcohols, yielding the corresponding esters in excellent yields ranging from 78% to 99%. Notably, the catalyst could be recovered and reused for up to 10 cycles without any significant loss in its performance and magnetic susceptibility. The strong reactivity and selectivity of the developed catalyst can be attributed to the well-distributed acidic sites on the 3D PIL support, which offers accessible nano-ionic active sites. Additionally, the hydrophobic nature of the network catalysts facilitates the easy diffusion of starting materials and provides excellent water repellency, thereby enhancing the reaction yield.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.354
Threshold uncertainty score0.663

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNanoscaleSame topicChemical Synthesis and ReactionsFrench-language works237,207