MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412190386 · doi:10.37536/rlm.2025.37.1.113720

Como lo fazen agora. Sobre los mecanismos de actualización en la General estoria

2025· article· es· W4412190386 on OpenAlexafffund
Enrique Pato

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista de Literatura Medieval · 2025
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Policies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaUniversity of British Columbia
KeywordsAgoraHumanitiesPhilosophyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este trabajo, de corte descriptivo e interpretativo, ofrece un primer acercamiento a los mecanismos de actualización que están presentes en la General estoria de Alfonso X el Sabio. Para ello, primero se presenta el concepto de actualización y se resumen los aspectos más relevantes para su estudio en este texto medieval. Después, la noción se ejemplifica con toda una serie de casos de la obra, en relación a determinados eventos históricos, lugares, costumbres, creencias religiosas, prácticas y propiedades del pasado que se actualizan en el presente, esto es, en el ahora medieval de la época. Entre estos mecanismos destaca la construcción comparativa «como lo fazen agora», los diversos usos del verbo fazer y el adverbio agora, así como otros sintagmas del tipo «en Castilla» y «en España».

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.945
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista de Literatura MedievalSame topicSocial Sciences and PoliciesFrench-language works237,207