MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412190970 · doi:10.1111/acem.70094

First Trimester Point of Care Ultrasound: Imaging Features and Review Behaviors Associated With Diagnostic Accuracy

2025· article· en· W4412190970 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Gillian Sheppard, Lori Stolz, Jeremy S. Boyd, Martin Pusic, Jessica Baez, Patrick Minges, Matthew Swarm, Megan Hilbert, Marisa O’Brien, Katie M. Harris, Catherine Varner, Constance LeBlanc, Kathy Boutis

Bibliographic record

VenueAcademic Emergency Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEctopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenDalhousie UniversityMount Sinai HospitalMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersMemorial University of NewfoundlandEmergency Medicine Foundation
KeywordsMedicineOdds ratioObstetricsPregnancyMiscarriageUltrasoundOddsRadiologyGynecologyInternal medicineLogistic regression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to identify the most diagnostically challenging features in first-trimester point-of-care ultrasound (FT-POCUS) images. We also sought to determine the physician image review behaviors associated with increased diagnostic accuracy. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter prospective cross-sectional study in a convenience sample of emergency physicians in the United States and Canada. The web-based intervention included 400 FT-POCUS cases acquired via the transabdominal or transvaginal approach. Participants reviewed FT-POCUS cases to identify pregnancy-related imaging findings. We captured clickstream-level data with each case encounter, including the correctness of a participant's response and physician image review behaviors. RESULTS: We enrolled 317 participants, who collectively generated 16,295 case interpretations. The most diagnostically challenging imaging findings included eccentrically located gestational sac and endometrial collection/heterogeneous uterine material (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). Participants who reported "definite" certainty, as opposed to "probable," demonstrated a significantly higher odds of getting the diagnosis of intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) present or absent correct (OR = 4.48; 95% CI 4.00, 5.01) and a lower odds of time spent reviewing cases (OR = 0.46; 95% CI 0.40, 0.51). Those who reviewed a higher proportion of available views per case were more likely to accurately identify a fetal heartbeat (OR = 1.51; 95% 1.34, 1.69), multiple IUPs (OR = 1.33; 95% CI 1.10, 1.61), and adnexal structures (OR = 1.11; 95% CI 1.04, 1.17), but less likely to correctly identify an IUP (OR = 0.93; 95% CI 0.88, 0.99) and endometrial fluid collection/heterogeneous uterine material (OR = 0.96; 95% CI 0.92, 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Emergency physicians interpreting FT-POCUS images encountered specific diagnostic challenges that may increase risks to patient safety. We found that higher diagnostic confidence correlated with greater diagnostic accuracy and efficiency. Reviewing a larger proportion of available images improved diagnostic accuracy for some findings, but not for others.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.434
Threshold uncertainty score0.738

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAcademic Emergency MedicineSame topicEctopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and ManagementFrench-language works237,207