Improving Rice Yield under Direct Seeding through Synergistic Water and Fertilizer Management
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study focuses on the role of integrated water and fertilizer management in improving yield, quality, and resource use efficiency in direct-seeded rice systems. The findings reveal that comprehensive practices combining Alternate Wetting and Drying (AWD) with Site-Specific Nutrient Management (SSNM), controlled-release fertilizers, and precise nitrogen management significantly enhance yield components, water productivity, and nitrogen use efficiency in direct-seeded rice. Simultaneously, these strategies reduce greenhouse gas emissions and nutrient losses, mitigating environmental impacts. Case studies further validate the practical effectiveness of these approaches, demonstrating the feasibility of achieving high yields and sustainability in direct-seeded rice systems. This study underscores the critical importance of water and fertilizer synergy in enhancing the productivity and sustainability of direct-seeded rice, aiming to provide actionable solutions for addressing global food security challenges under resource constraints and offering directions for sustainable rice production.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it