MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412198938 · doi:10.1177/03098168251353410

“They talk and talk, they sell and sell ... the victory of the technician over the intellectual”: C. Wright Mills and the Neoliberal University

2025· article· en· W4412198938 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCapital & Class · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHigher Education Governance and Development
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWrightSociologyTechnocracyRationalization (economics)EthosCapitalist mode of productionCapitalismSocial scienceManagementEconomicsLawPoliticsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, the conceptual antecedents of the neoliberal university in the prescient writings of C. Wright Mills identified, explicated and discussed. His detailed observations of and analysis of the transformations in the structure, form, and mode of knowledge production in the universities of his time provide insights into the social dynamics of the genesis of the global neoliberal academy much before the term gained currency. Drawing upon Marx and Weber’s concepts of alienation and rationalization respectively, C. Wright Mills provided valuable sociological insights into the emergence as well as the consolidation of the neoliberal ethos and norms in the academy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.795
Threshold uncertainty score0.663

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it