MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412199695 · doi:10.37693/pjos.2024.11.26130

Phonosemantics of the Open Front Unrounded Vowel /a/ in Standard Igbo and Ogbunike Igbo Variety

2025· article· en· W4412199695 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Aghaegbuna Haroldson Uwaezuoke, Chinedu Uchechukwu

Bibliographic record

VenuePublic Journal of Semiotics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPhonetics and Phonology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIgboVariety (cybernetics)VowelLinguisticsMathematicsPhilosophyStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Among the phonemes of the Igbo language is the open front unrounded vowel /a/. It is here argued that it has certain phonosemantic connotations when uttered alone at different pitches in standard Igbo and Ogbunike Igbo variety. We further examine the role tone plays in revealing the phonosemantic associations of this vowel. The primary data were supplied by the two authors as Igbo native speakers, combined with the first author’s intuitive knowledge of Ogbunike variety. The secondary data were obtained from Swadesh 100 Wordlist, the authors-adapted Wordlist of 141 words, and other existing literature. Three other competent Igbo native speakers were orally interviewed and their judgements helped for the analysis. A qualitative research approach was adopted for the analysis, revealing that, in addition to the earlier findings in the literature that the vowel has phonosemantic connotations of vigorous activity, strong, bright, and extended, it connotes bravery, domineering, intimidating, versatility, and spreading. Finally, it could also be confirmed that, through additional changes in pitch, /a/ also connotes surprise in Standard Igbo and Ogbunike Igbo Variety, but attention in Ogbunike Igbo Variety.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.168
Threshold uncertainty score0.419

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePublic Journal of SemioticsSame topicPhonetics and Phonology ResearchFrench-language works237,207