Enhancing s-CO2 Brayton Power Cycle Efficiency in Cold Ambient Conditions Through Working Fluid Blends
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Supercritical carbon dioxide (s-CO2) Brayton cycles have emerged as a promising technology for high-efficiency power generation, owing to their compact architecture and favorable thermophysical properties. However, their performance degrades significantly under cold-climate conditions—such as those encountered in Greenland, Russia, Canada, Scandinavia, and Alaska—due to the proximity to the fluid’s critical point. This study investigates the behavior of the recompression Brayton cycle (RBC) under subzero ambient temperatures through the incorporation of low-critical-temperature additives to create CO2-based binary mixtures. The working fluids examined include methane (CH4), tetrafluoromethane (CF4), nitrogen trifluoride (NF3), and krypton (Kr). Simulation results show that CH4- and CF4-rich mixtures can achieve thermal efficiency improvements of up to 10 percentage points over pure CO2. NF3-containing blends yield solid performance in moderately cold environments, while Kr-based mixtures provide modest but consistent efficiency gains. At low compressor inlet temperatures, the high-temperature recuperator (HTR) becomes the dominant performance-limiting component. Optimal distribution of recuperator conductance (UA) favors increased HTR sizing when mixtures are employed, ensuring effective heat recovery across larger temperature differentials. The study concludes with a comparative exergy analysis between pure CO2 and mixture-based cycles in RBC architecture. The findings highlight the potential of custom-tailored working fluids to enhance thermodynamic performance and operational stability of s-CO2 power systems under cold-climate conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".