Integrated CAD/CAM Approach for Parametric Design and High Precision Fabrication of Planar Curvilinear Structures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Curvilinear V-grooves are increasingly employed in functional surfaces with applications ranging from fluidics to tribology and optics. Despite their widespread use, the accurate and repeatable fabrication of curvilinear V-grooves remains challenging due to their inherent geometric complexity and the lack of relevant commercial CAD/CAM systems. To address this, the present study proposes a CAD/CAM integrated framework capable of automating the design and fabrication of functional surfaces comprising curvilinear V-grooves generated by multi-axis single-point diamond cutting (SPDC). The framework is organized into three main functional blocks supported by seven secondary modules that encompass the entire process from V-groove geometry definition to cutting. The developed framework was practically validated by fabricating sinusoidal V-grooves on a flat surface and testing the capillary flow functionality of a curvilinear pattern. These results demonstrate the relevance of the integrated framework to curvilinear V-groove fabrication, thereby offering a versatile solution for certain types of surface engineering applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".