MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412200814 · doi:10.3390/cleantechnol7030059

Valorization of Agricultural Ashes from Cold and Temperate Regions as Alternative Supplementary Cementitious Materials: A Review

2025· review· en· W4412200814 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueClean Technologies · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicConcrete and Cement Materials Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersMitacs
KeywordsCementitiousEnvironmental sciencePozzolanBioenergyWaste managementAgricultureHuskPortland cementEngineeringCementBiofuelMaterials scienceEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The pursuit of sustainable alternatives to portland cement has become a global imperative within the construction sector, driven by the need to reduce carbon dioxide emissions and energy consumption. Among the promising alternatives, agricultural ashes have garnered attention for their potential as alternative supplementary cementitious materials (ASCMs), owing to their inherent pozzolanic properties when appropriately processed. However, the availability and utilization of these ashes have predominantly been concentrated in tropical and subtropical regions, where such biomass is more abundant. This review offers a comprehensive bibliometric analysis to identify and assess agricultural ashes (specifically switchgrass, barley, sunflower, and oat husks) that are cultivated in temperate and cold climates and exhibit potential for SCM application. The analysis aims to bridge the knowledge gap by systematically mapping the existing research landscape and highlighting underexplored resources suitable for cold-region implementation. Key processing parameters, including incineration temperature, retention duration, and post-combustion grinding techniques, are critically examined for their influence on the resulting ash’s physicochemical characteristics and pozzolanic reactivity. In addition, the effect on fresh, hardened, and durability properties was evaluated. Findings reveal that several crops grown in colder regions may produce ashes rich in reactive silica, thereby qualifying them as viable ASCM candidates and bioenergy sources. Notably, the ashes derived from switchgrass, barley, oats, and sunflowers demonstrate significant reactive silica content, reinforcing their potential in sustainable construction practices. Hence, this study underscores the multifaceted benefits of contributing to the decarbonization of the cement industry and circular economy, while addressing environmental challenges associated with biomass waste disposal and uncontrolled open-air combustion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.762
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it