MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412201247 · doi:10.1515/zrgg-2025-0012

(Post)Koloniale Rechtswissenschaft. Geschichte und Gegenwart des Kolonialismus in der deutschen Rechtswissenschaft. Hg. v. Philipp Dann/Isabel Feichtner/Jochen von Bernstorff

2025· article· de· W4412201247 on OpenAlexaff
Helge Dedek

Bibliographic record

VenueZeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte Germanistische Abteilung · 2025
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEuropean and International Contract Law
Canadian institutionsDawson College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Article (Post)Koloniale Rechtswissenschaft. Geschichte und Gegenwart des Kolonialismus in der deutschen Rechtswissenschaft. Hg. v. Philipp Dann/Isabel Feichtner/Jochen von Bernstorff was published on June 1, 2025 in the journal Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte: Germanistische Abteilung (volume 142, issue 1).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.913
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0050.002
Research integrity0.0030.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte Germanistische AbteilungSame topicEuropean and International Contract LawFrench-language works237,207