MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412202929 · doi:10.5325/jspecphil.39.3.0348

Perception, Heroism, and the Problem of Expression

2025· article· en· W4412202929 on OpenAlexaff
Emmanuel Cuisinier

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Speculative Philosophy · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicLeadership, Courage, and Heroism Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerceptionExpression (computer science)PsychologyCognitive psychologySocial psychologyComputer scienceNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT This article argues that current scholarship on Merleau-Ponty’s discussion of heroism contextualizes it within his political writings and, as a result of that, it neglects his interest in the primacy of perception for describing experiences of heroic action—such as the kind of heroism depicted in Saint-Exupéry’s memoir cited at the end of Phenomenology of Perception. This article further argues that he not only addresses heroism as a key solution to what he calls “the problem of freedom” at the perceptual level, but that he is also concerned with how it translates into the paradox of expression that comes up in his later works.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.338
Threshold uncertainty score0.263

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Speculative PhilosophySame topicLeadership, Courage, and Heroism StudiesFrench-language works237,207