MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4412234711

Exploring Institutionalised Esport in High School: A Mixed Methods Study on Wellbring

2018· article· en· W4412234711 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Anne Fiskaali, Andreas Lieberoth, Helle Spindler

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSport and Mega-Event Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

These proceedings represent the work of contributors to the 12th European Conference on Game Based Learning (ECGBL 2018), hosted this year by SKEMA Business School, Sophia Antipolis, France on 4-5 October 2018. The Conference Chair is Dr Melanie Cuissi and the Programme Co-Chairs are Dr Sophie Gay Anger and Dr Margarida Romero. ECGBL is a well-established event on the academic research conference calendar and now in its 12th year the key aim remains the opportunity for participants to share ideas and meet the people who hold them. The scope of papers will ensure an interesting two days. The subjects covered illustrate the wide range of topics that fall into this important and ever-growing area of research. For the 5th year the conference has also played host to the International Educational Games Competitions. The opening keynote presentation is given by Dr Sylvester Arnab from Coventry University's Disruptive Media Learning Lab (DMLL) on the topic of “The Magic Circle of Playful and Gameful Co-Creation”. Then an afternoon keynote will be given by Dr Eric Sanchez from the University of Fribourg, Switzerland, with the talk entitled “Don’t Forget the Beans!”. The second day of the conference will open with an address by Dr Jacob Habgood from Sheffield University, who will be discussing “Do Books Work? (and other questions we probably shouldn’t ask)”. With an initial submission of 205 abstracts, after the double blind, peer review process there are 90 Academic research papers, 7 PhD research papers, 3 Masters Research papers and 15 work-in-progress papers published in these Conference Proceedings. These papers represent research from Australia, Austria, Bahrain, Bulgaria, Canada, China, Cyprus, the Czech Republic,Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Guatemala, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Iran, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Malaysia, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Qatar Romania, Russia, Slovakia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Thailand, the UK, and the USA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.024
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.027
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.126

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0240.027
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0050.004
Scholarly communication0.0100.007
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.275
GPT teacher head0.451
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSport and Mega-Event Impacts→French-language works237,207→