MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412253379

Skattemæsssig kvalifikation af trusts i praksis

2013· article· da· W4412253379 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageda
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicRegional Development and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsInstitute on Governance
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTheologyPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Artiklen har til formål at systematisere og redegøre for skattemyndighedernes fremgangsmåde og kvalifikation af trusts i dansk ret. Baggrunden herfor er, at antallet af trust-sager for såvel de administrative myndigheder som domstolene relativt set er vokset betydeligt siden årtusindeskiftet. Ud fra en gennemgang af doms- og administrativ praksis kan det konstateres, at kvalifikationen af trusts kan opdeles i fire hovedkategorier, som er væsentlige at have kendskab til, såfremt en skattesag indeholdende trust-elementer måtte være under opsejling. Endvidere inddrages skattestrafferetlig praksis på baggrund af en nyligt afsagt landsretsdom vedrørende en offshore trust.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.227
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5380.328

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it