MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412275753

Mere om ansvar for menneskerettighedsbrud

2018· article· da· W4412275753 on OpenAlexaff
Rasmus Grønved Nielsen, Andreas Bloch Ehlers

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageda
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEuropean and International Law Studies
Canadian institutionsInstitute on Governance
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Artiklen er en kommentar til to nyere artikler i Juristen af henholdsvis Helle lsager m.fl. og Hanne Hartoft vedrørende kommuners erstatningsansvar for brud på EMRK artikel 3. Først fastslås, at der - modsat hvad der hævdes i artiklerne - gælder et objektivt ansvar for brud på menneskerettigheder, hvilket følger af den nyere højesteretsdom i U 2017.2929 H. Herefter gøres der nogle kritiske bemærkninger til de betragtninger om passivitet og ansvarssubjektivitet, der fremføres i førstnævnte artikel af Helle lsager m.fl.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.140
Threshold uncertainty score0.468

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.004
Scholarly communication0.0150.005
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0060.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1400.060

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.092
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)Same topicEuropean and International Law StudiesFrench-language works237,207