MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4412306009

Little auk and thick-billed murre in the NOW Polynya

2017· article· en· W4412306009 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Anders Mosbech, Kasper Lambert Johansen, Flemming Ravn Merkel, Peter Lyngs, Christine Cuyler, Jannie Fries Linnebjerg

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer-related molecular mechanisms research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFisheryGeographyEnvironmental scienceBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We describe ecological linkages for the little auk and thick-billed murre population in the North Water region and discuss potential future trends based on a comparison with little auk and thick-billed murre colonies elsewhere in the Arctic with different ice conditions and prey availability. The NOW Polynya marine ecosystem is host to the largest seabird populations in Greenland and the area has a diverse seabird assemblage with 14 regular breeders. The little auk and the thick-billed murre are the most abundant of all the seabird species in NOW, and the two species have the largest biomass. While the thick-billed murre has a widespread distribution across the Arctic, the large little auk colonies occur only in the High Arctic near a polynya or other productive marine areas. Although the abundance estimate is uncertain, the little auk population in the NOW region is estimated at 33 mill. pairs, which amounts to more than 80 % of the world population. These huge numbers cause a significant fertilizing impact in the terrestrial environment near the large colonies. The little auks feed their chicks in the colony on High arctic copepods, which are especially large and lipid-rich, and also to some extend rely on the copepods for their own foraging, supplemented with other zooplankton. The high abundance of the large Calanus copepods in NOW during summer is most likely the main cause for the high abundance of little auks in the NOW area. Climate change could change the copepod availability and potentially cause declines in the little auk population. However, some flexibility in little auk prey items has been documented from colonies in East Greenland and Svalbard. With its ecological linkages to the NOW, we argue that the little auk may serve as an important monitoring organism of changes in the NOW ecosystem in the future, and propose parameters which could potentially form part of such a monitoring program. The thick-billed murre colonies in the Greenland part of the NOW region hold about 362,000 birds (count figure) and makes up about 2/3 of the Greenland breeding population. NOW is the only region in Greenland where the thick-billed murre is not declining. The population trend in NOW appears to resemble the stable development observed for colonies in the eastern Canadian Arctic. This is in contrast to declining trends for colonies in the rest of Greenland, Iceland and Svalbard. The causes of the declines in recent decades are not fully resolved. We assume that historical spring hunting near the colonies in Greenland has had a strong impact on West Greenland colonies south of Upernavik. There has been much lower hunting pressure in the NOW area, which exhibits stable colonies. In recent decades, the overall trend in the Atlantic Arctic colonies seems driven by a combination of harvest pressure and large-scale ecosystem changes occurring in the wintering areas. The thick-billed murres from the NOW area winter primarily off Newfoundland, where conditions seems to be relatively favourable compared to West Greenland and the central and western Atlantic, where many of the declining murre populations winter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.261
Threshold uncertainty score0.518

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCancer-related molecular mechanisms research→French-language works237,207→