MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4412308998

Severe Toxicity during Chemotherapy Treatment for Pediatric Acute Myeloid Leukemia

2018· article· en· W4412308998 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ditte J. A. Løhmann

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMyeloid leukemiaChemotherapyToxicityMedicineOncologyMyeloidLeukemiaInternal medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Treatment for pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is highly intensive, and thus almost all patients will experience severe toxicities, which are often life-threatening. In 5–10% of patients, treatment for pediatric AML is fatal. To minimize the adverse effects of treatment, identification and characterization of risk factors for severe toxicity is important. Furthermore, toxic and leukemic responses could be related, and it is likely that toxic response is associated with treatment outcome. The focus of this thesis is to describe the severe toxicities occurring during pediatric AML treatment, investigate potential risk factors and describe prophylactic measures and their safety. In addition, we aimed to investigate how toxicity and risk factors for toxicity are related to treatment outcome. The studies in the thesis are based on three different cohorts. Study I is based on a cohort of children diagnosed with AML in the five Nordic countries and Hong Kong. For study II, the cohort was expanded to include children diagnosed in the Netherlands, Belgium, Canada, and the USA. The cohort for studies III and IV was the same: Children diagnosed with AML in the Nordic countries, Hong Kong, Belgium, and the Netherlands. In study I, we found that 90% of children had experienced grade 3–4 toxicities. Overweight and older age were associated with increased risk of severe toxicity. In study II, we found no significant differences in risk of relapse and death for four bodymass index (BMI) groups, in contrast to previous reports. Obesity was associated with core binding factor AML. In study III, we found that time to neutrophil recovery after the first induction course was associated with time to neutrophil recovery after the remaining courses. Furthermore, longer time to neutrophil recovery after the first induction course was associated with increased risk of microbiologically documented infection and increased risk of relapse. In study IV, we found that use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) as supportive care was frequent in the cohort, but decreased with time. Use of G-CSF was associated with an increased risk of relapse. Severe acute toxicities, especially infections, are a large problem in the treatment of pediatric AML and measures for prevention are limited. The studies in this thesis have brought further insight into severe toxicities occurring during treatment for pediatric AML, which will be important knowledge in the attempt to minimize the treatment burden in the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research→French-language works237,207→