MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4412324524

Monitoring contamination using biogenic materials & LA-ICP-MS – Examples from Black Angel Pb-Zn mine, West Greenland

2018· article· en· W4412324524 on OpenAlexaff
Agda Sophia Veronica Hansson, Lis Bach, Norman M. Halden, Jens Søndergaard

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContaminationEnvironmental chemistryInductively coupled plasma mass spectrometryEnvironmental scienceGeologyChemistryGeochemistryMass spectrometryChromatographyBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Metal pollution from mining activities is a well-known environmental concern, and detailed environmental monitoring before, during, and after mining is essential to evaluate the pollution status of a mining area. Traditionally, monitoring entails sampling of a selection of key monitoring organisms (e.g. lichens, sea weed, bivalve mollusks and sedentary fish species) and the estimated contamination status of the area is based on assessment of metal analyses (e.g. Q/HR-ICP-MS) in soft-tissues and organs from the key monitoring organism. Although metal concentrations in soft tissues is a valid proxy for metal exposure and recent metal pollution, such analysis provide no temporal information on metal exposure, uptake and accumulation over time. However, recent advances in analytical techniques such as laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) have opened new opportunities for analyzing low concentrations of metals in biogenic materials (e.g. otoliths and shells) with a very fine spatial resolution1. Such mineralized biogenic materials are considered metabolically stable, grow continuously during the lifetime of the organism, and have the ability to incorporate metals. Consequently, biogenic materials may provide a complete time-resolved chemical record of organism’s exposure history. A preliminary study2 indicates that LA-ICP-MS analyses of sculpin otoliths, collected along a distance gradient near the Pb-Zn Black Angel-mine (West Greenland), have the potential to become a valuable method for assessing time-resolved metal loading near mine sites. The study showed that sculpin otoliths incorporated Pb, which is the most important pollutant in the area, but also that the annual variations in the otolith Pb concentrations was controlled by a complex interaction between Pb exposure in the environment and physiological processes in the fish. Consequently, further studies are required to investigate the links between metal sources, pathways, and the geochemical and physiological processes controlling otolith metal concentrations. Here, we continue the analysis of chemical compositions of fish otoliths collected near the Black Angel-mine (e.g. Myoxocephalus scorpius and Gadus ogac) and combine it with data on metal accumulation in blood and organs of the fish as well as other environmental proxies for metal contamination. In addition, we also investigate the potential of LA-ICP-MS analyses on a range of other solid biogenic samples including shells of blue mussels and sea snails (Mytilus edulis/Mytilus trossulus, Littorina saxitilis) as well as rotula bones from sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis). If successful, the potential application of solid biogenic material as archives of metal pollution can become an important new tool for environmental monitoring of contaminated areas, especially at remote sites where the location logistically inhibits frequent monitoring on an annual scale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score0.140

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping→French-language works237,207→